Commentary for Bava Kamma 178:3
הא ודאי ר"מ היא דאמר אסור לאדם שישהא את אשתו אפילו שעה אחת בלא כתובה
why should she in this case not assign her <i>kethubah</i> to the husband and thus let him have the satisfaction of the benefit as compensation for the injury, for even if she releases her husband from the obligation no loss will result therefrom? — This teaching is surely based on the view of R. Meir who said<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra, p. 515, n. 6. ');"><sup>3</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 178:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.